Epson 1520, Epson 3000, Epson 5000, 5500 sheet fed color inkjet printers
now replaced by the Epson 4000
Many
people found the Epson 3000 the most economical way
to attempt to mimic the production of fine art prints. But none of
the alluring ads admit to the occasional deficiencies and the design
defects of these infamous tabloid sized inkjet printers. Go onto any
Epson user group and you can also get the whole list of problems from
ozone discoloration of the media to metamerism (on the newer models).
You also meet
plenty of Epson printer users who are perfectly content though it's
worth asking why the Canon desktop printers have such a good reputation.
If
you run your Epson printers with
BEST color management RIP the combination is an industry
standard for color proofing. The Epson 3000 is also the standard printer
for use with dye transfer (heat dye sublimation inks) for heat transfer
onto T-shirts, tiles, and mouse pads. Just be aware of inherent defects
of the models 1520 and 3000. Fortunately the Epson
5500 overcomes the foibles of the earlier models and
offers higher quality and more flexibility.
Just
be sure you are familiar with the legendary features of the earlier
model 3000 printer. As several people told me "the paper feeder
mechanism is the first part that will break." I got the impression
that one company had to have five of the model 3000 in order to have
enough functioning to keep the company going. They joked that it was
easier to leave the printer in the box and have it print from inside
the shipping box, as that spared them the hassle of having to pack
it up again to send it back to Epson for repairs.
One
Epson loyalist wrote, very upset, and told me that obviously I had
never used an Epson 3000 (which is true, why should I buy a product
that may not function). So this Epson loyalist said that the other
people who had problems obviously had little experience in using computers.
Yet my brother is trained in computers at the main technical university
in Zurich, Switzerland (as well as trained at Georgia Tech). His entire
company (architects), got rid of their pesky Epson printers. Now they
have an Hewlett-Packard DesignJet (I believe the
model 1055) and are very happy.
Every
time a loyalist writes and asks why I don't give a higher rating to
their pet printer, that means I have to offer a balance. That is,
if I print what the loyalist says, it is only fair that I also provide
the feedback from experienced end users. Since I just got another
e-mail from a loyalist who asked for me to present the positive sides
of this printer (that it can do proofing and can do fine art prints)
that also generated the need for a touch of reality. That is from
a computer tech at a studio with at least three Epson 3000 printers.
Since he is the one that had to get the Epson 3000's
running again after they crashed, he was one very adamant computer
tech. He gave me a long list of why he wished these printers could
be replaced. This was a community college. In the need to be fair
I will say that one of the professors just loved the Epson 3000 and
was very content. He was a capable artist and also owner of a commercial
graphics design studio. But he also reported that their two Hewlett-Packard
DesignJet printers were fabulous for the students, the one thing his
own computer tech agreed with.
The
Epson software printer drivers are legendary for being quirky, a polite
way for saying they are not always dependable. This means they often
don't function like you need them to. So be sure you get a real PostScript
RIP or at least a serious RIP that can handle the printer. Don't forget,
the RIP is the brains of the printer. A desktop printer with no RIP
is limited (didn't you ever wonder why those desktop inkjet printers
were so cheap to buy).
And
something the Epson ads neglect to mention; the prints from an Epson
1520, Epson 3000 fade within a day or so if you make
the mistake of leaving them in the sun. They fade inside even if no
sun comes near them. Fortunately you can get many nice
after-market inks.
If
you don't mind waiting up to 20 minutes for a single print; if you
don't mind the paper feeder breaking; if you have the patience of
Job and somehow the New Economy has left you out of the trickle down
theory, then the Epson 3000 is indeed a cheap way to enter the inkjet
world to experiment with rudimentary fine art printing. Just because
the advertisements fail our standards and the printer also, that is
no reason at all that you should avoid the printer. This may be an
acceptable printer for you to consider. However you really need a
printer that has a higher dpi and six colors.
But
don't make the mistake of seeing this as a godsend that can reproduce
limited editions of 200 copies of your portfolio. Even Job's patience
would run out waiting for the 50th copy. Don't forget, printing without
a separate RIP server ties up your computer also, unless you have
a multitasking PC or a separate Mac just to baby-sit your Epson 3000.
These are again little tidbits of information that some of the other
reviews spare the newcomer. Sorry we don't mince our words. If you
only need to print one or two copies, then its okay.
PlotterSupplies
does sell reconditioned Epson printers. If you wish a refurbished
Epson printer, contact Michael E. Falagrady National Sales Manager
Plotter Supplies, Inc./Qmax Digital toll-free: 800.365.3305 303.450.2900
fax: 303.450.0926 e-mail mike@plottersupplies.co
At
Seybold trade show I met an artist who said he
is perfectly content with his Epson 3000 and occasionally I get e-mail
expressing the same sentiment. Indeed that is why I feel it is necessary
to present both sides of the story. Yet both those users were well
aware of the pitfalls, glitches, and congenital defects. If the ads
were as forthright we would award a higher rating to these printers.
If
you are doing color proofs with BEST and using Lyson or other inks, you can ignore most of the complaints.
The BESTColor RIP ought to eliminate the quirky Epson driver system.
The Lyson inks don't fade the first day outdoors nor the 5th month
indoors. There are other RIP´s that are useful in case you want
to do fine art but need just a RIP for layout and production.
These
Epson desktop printers are so cheap that if they break down you can
just throw them away and buy another. Use Lysonic inks and your results
are ready for any museum exhibit. InfoWave (they make PowerPrint)
also make a PostScript driver for Inkjets, so try it out. We love
PowerPrint to do correspondence with an HP on a Mac (HP are not very
Mac friendly and need a special driver and a special cable). InfoWave
was recently sold to another company, Strydent Software. But the only
desktop printer from Epson that meets our minimum standards is the
Epson
Stylus Pro 5500.
As
soon as we accumulate more experience with the Epson 5500 we will
provide additional information. Don't have any horror stories on that
model. I would, however, recommend skipping the EFI Fiery RIP? Why?
read my reviews on RIP´s in this web site and the other printer
sites and you will see why most of the other RIP´s are better.
Look in the index of each site, under RIP naturally. All the indices
are in the link-table at the bottom of every page. Or, to be easier,
just order the FLAAR
Report Series on "RIP´s for Large format printer"
At
the February PMA
2001 trade show, Epson introduced the Epson model 5500, which
is intended for printing photographs in general and for portrait photographers
in particular. As we get more experience from this new model we will
report more about it. Hewlett-Packard does not have any desktop model
that offers six colors or has 1200 dpi or higher. Canon has their
desktop model 8500, which is capable of producing outstanding color,
but no pigmented inks are available. You can, however, evidently use
Lyson inks in the Canon printers.
If
you wish to upgrade from the Epson 1520 or Epson 3000 to the improved
quality Epson 2000 or 5500, then you should consult a place that knows
fine art giclée printing with desktop sized inkjet printers. We recommend
Parrot Digigraphic, e-mail imaging@parrotcolor.com
Every day we get tearful complaints from people who bought the a printer from a source incapable of providing support.
Last
checked : Nov. 7, 2003
Previous updates: Sept. 23, 3003, Jan. 15, 2003, Nov. 15, 2002,
June 23, 2001